Светска трговска организација (СТО)

Светска трговска организација (СТО)

An organization that intends to supervise and liberalize international trade. The organization officially commenced on January 1, 1995 under the Marrakech Agreement, replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which commenced in 1948.

0 0

Cải thiện

Thêm hình ảnh

Loại từ: proper noun
Từ đồng nghĩa:
Blossary:
Ngành nghề/Lĩnh vực: Legal services
Category: Courts
Company:
Sản phẩm:
Viết tắt-Từ viết tắt:

Thêm vào Bảng chú giải thuật ngữ của tôi

Ngôn ngữ khác:

Thuật ngữ liên quan

Комитет за човекови права на Обединетите нации

Legal services; Courts

A United Nations body of 18 experts that meets three times a year for four-week sessions (spring session at UN headquarters in New York, summer and fall sessions at the UN Office ...

Судот за арбитрација за спорт

Legal services; Courts

An international arbitration body set up to settle disputes related to sport. Its headquarters are in Lausanne and its courts are located in New York, Sydney and Lausanne, ...

Северноамерикански договор за слободна трговија (НАФТА)

Legal services; Courts

An agreement signed by the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States, creating a trilateral trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, ...

Постојан арбитражен суд

Legal services; Courts

An international organization based in The Hague in the Netherlands. The court was established in 1899 as one of the acts of the first Hague Peace Conference, which makes it the ...

Меѓународниот воен трибунал за Далечниот Исток

Legal services; Courts

These are known as the Tokyo Trials, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal or simply as the Tribunal, was convened on April 29, 1946, to try the leaders of the Empire of Japan for three ...

Економската заедница на Западно африканските земји

Legal services; Courts

A Community Court of Justice created by a protocol signed in 1991 and was later included in Article 6 of the Revised Treaty of the Community in 1993. However, the Court didn’t ...